Leucocyte Variation, an Insight of Host Defenses During Hymenolepiasis and Restoration with Praziquantel

Corresponding Author:

 J. PARVATHI E-mail: saip_jayanthi@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Haematological studies in helminthiasis reveal drastic alterations in the white blood cells (leucocytes), and its various components like neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and eosinophils. The use of proper anthelmintic agent, restores normalcy in the infected host. These variations during helminth infections reflect the host defense status in combating the parasitic attack. The present study involves the evaluation of these total and differential haematological alterations, induced in the laboratory mouse Mus musculus, infested with the intestinal helminth, Hymenolepis nana (dwarf tapeworm), and treated with the praziquantel, using an automatic Coulter Counter.

Key Words:

Coulter counter, Hymenolepis nana, histomorphology, Mus musculus, praziquantel, white blood cells

Blood is one of the most important specimen studied during parasitic infections and diseases in mice as experimental models. The total leucocyte (white blood cell) count (TLC) is an important diagnostic tool to assess the host immune status and resistance to disease or infection[1,2]. The differential leucocyte count (DLC) is a significant parameter in the blood picture of an animal, especially during any kind of stress from disease, trauma, and infection. The leucocytes of most strains of mice mainly contain neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and eosinophils, while basophils are almost absent[3]. Most of the routine haematological tests described by Dacie[4] for humans and by Schalm[5] for larger animals are applicable to rats and mice, using electronic cell counters.

Hymenolepis nana, is a cosmopolitan intestinal cestode helminth of the warmer climates, whose entire life-cycle is completed in the bowel, so infection can persist for years if left untreated. This worldwide infection was previously common in the southeastern USA, and has been described in crowded environments and individuals confined to institutions. H. nana infections can grow worse over time because, unlike in most tapeworms, H. nana eggs can hatch and develop without ever leaving the definitive host. Praziquantel, the broad-spectrum anthelmintic, (2-cyclohexyl carbonyl-1,3,4,6,7,11bhexahydro- 2H-pyrazino(2,1-a)isoquinoline-4-one), showed one hundred percent cure with 25 mg/kg body weight dosage in various hosts[6]. In the present investigation, these blood parameters were assayed using an automatic Coulter Counter.

Adult healthy male Swiss albino mice, Mus musculus about 4-5 weeks old, weighing 20-25 g were maintained under GLP conditions[7], fed with the commercial pellet diet and water ad libitum in polypropylene shoe-box cages with sterile paddy husk bedding which was periodically changed. Onethird of the total mice were kept as the uninfected control batch. Two-thirds mice were orally infected with about 100 viable eggs of Hymenolepis nana per mouse, and maintained as the infected batch. These infected mice were thus maintained until the 16^th day of infection to complete the life cycle of the parasite. On the 16^th day, half of the infected mice were given a single oral dose of praziquantel, a 0.2 ml suspension at 25 mg/kg bodyweight of the host mice. This batch was maintained for 3 days as the treated batch. The control, infected and treated batches of mice were sacrificed at appropriate times. Blood was collected by the decapitation method[8], anticoagulated with 1.5 mg/ml blood of the dipotasium salt of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), the total and differential leucocyte counts analyzed using an automatic Blood Analyzer[9,10], the Beckman Coulter HMX Haematology Analyzer with Autoloader which is a quantitive, automated heamatology analyzer.

The Coulter VCS established WBC differential technology using three measurements: Individual cell volume (V); high frequency conductivity (C) and Laser-light scatter (S). This combination technology provides abundant cell by cell information that is translated by the instrument into conventional stained film leukocyte categories. The leucocyte counts assayed were, total leucocyte count (TLC number/ cu.mm) and differential leucocyte count (DLC) which includes neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), eosinophils (E), monocytes (M), expressed in %.

The statistical values for each blood parameter of a batch is the mean of five individual observations, showing significance at probability P<0.05, and nonsignificant (NS) at P>0.05. According to applicability of the values, Parametric ‘t’ test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test were applied.

The WBC showed variations in the uninfected, H. nana infected and praziquantel treated host blood. The infected host blood registered a 24% decrease, the praziquantel treated, a 16% increase, over the control host blood for the TLC. In the DLC category, the neutrophils (N) showed a 10% drop, lymphocytes increased by 27%, while monocytes, 2% and eosinophils, 4%, made their appearance, in the infected host blood. Basophils were not found.

Haematological pictures reflect the immune response of the host to infection. The present investigation revealed some important pathological aspects of the helminth infection in the host. Depleted level of TLC, Leucopenia, in the blood of infected mice could be due to severe loss of cellular components of the blood because of haemophagy (Table 1). This could be due to result of a series of changes in the immunological setup of the mouse under parasitic stress[11-13]. Wright (1960) suggested that a decrease in WBC count could be because of autolysis caused due to hydrolytic enzymes leaked out of cells under parasitism, which could also indicate either haemorrhage[14] or the increase in the haemopoietic machinery of the host to cope up the rising infection.

TABLE 1: TOTAL LEUCOCYTE COUNT (TLC) (/CU.MM) OF MUS MUSCULUS DURING HYMENOLEPIS NANA INFECTION AND TREATMENT WITH ANTHELMINTIC PRAZIQUANTEL

Differential leucocytes such as lymphocytes and neutrophils are produced by the erythrocytic tissue. The decrease in the phagocytic neutrophil count, Neutropenia, in the infected host indicates the tendency of losing defense mechanism during parasitism due to the lysis of these cells by the enzymes of the parasite (Table 2).

TABLE 2: DIFFERENTIAL LEUCOCYTE COUNT (DLC) (%) OF MUS MUSCULUS DURING HYMENOLEPIS NANA INFECTION AND TREATMENT WITH ANTHELMINTIC PRAZIQUANTEL

Lymphocytes, the immunocompetent cells, are responsible for the immune response of the host. The present increase in the lymphocyte count, Lymphocytosis, reflects the host’s immune response to overcome parasitic stress, after the phagocytic neutrophils failed in checking the invading parasites (Table 2). This is in accordance with the findings of Fetterer et al[15] who found an increase in the immunity to H. nana infection by transfer from spleen cells. Lymphocytes are essential for the repair mechanism.

There is also an increase in the eosinophil count in infected host blood (Table 2). Eosinophilia is a hallmark of helminthiasis[16]. The eosinophilia observed in the present study is in accordance with that observed by Furukawa et al.[17] in the peripheral blood of mice due to Hymenolepiasis.

The increase in monocytes, Monocytosis, too, is an immunological response of the infected host to combat hymenolepiasis (Table 2). The Kupffer cells of liver are believed to be the source of monocytes. This is substantiated with the increase in the Kupffer cells noted in infected liver in some studies. It could be possible that some toxic metabolites may be transported from intestine to liver, resulting in these changes[18-20].

Thus the variations in white blood parameters of the infected host in this study, leucopenia, neutropenia, lymphocytosis, eosinophilia and monocytosis, indicate the various defense mechanisms adopted by the host to combat the H. nana infection. The values of all the parameters in the treated batches of host blood are nearer to the uninfected control host blood value, which clearly proves the efficacy of the anthelmintic praziquantel as a single oral dose regimen in restoring normal haematological profile in the infected host. All of these results are tabulated.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Management of Vivek Vardhini College, Hyderabad, for the Laboratory facilities; Dr. G. S. T. Sai, Former Senior Research Executive, Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Limited (IDPL), Dr. J. Surya Kumar, Senior Director, Dr. Reddy’s Labs, Hyderabad, for valuable Pharmacological suggestions, and Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), Hyderabad, for Haematological analysis.

References

1. Astavief BA. On the possibility of development of Hymenolepis nana (Siebold, 1852) in mesenteric lymph nodes of white mice. MeditsinskayaParazitologiyaiparazitarnyeBolezni 1966;35:93-7.
2. Garside P, Behnke JM. Ancylostomaceylanicum in the hamster: Observation on the host-parasite relationship during primary infection. Parasitology 1989;98:283-9.
3. Hardy J. Heamatology of rats and mice. In: Cotchin E, Roe FJ, editors. Pathology of laboratory rats and mice. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publication; 1941. p. 501-36.
4. Dacie JV. Practical Haematology. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1964. p. 18-126.
5. Schalm OW. Veterinary haematology. London, Bailliere: Tindall and Cox; 1961. p. 30-84.
6. Thomas H, Gonnert R. The efficacy of praziquantel against cestodes in animals. Z Parasitenkd 1977;52:117-27.
7. Bodil L. Good Laboratory Practice: Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science: Selection and Handling of animals in Biomedical Research. Vol. 1. London, NewYork: CRC Press; 1994. p. 37-40.
8. Dieterich RA. Haematologic values for five northenmicrotines. Lab Anim Sci 1972;22:390-2.
9. Lewis SM, England JM, Rowan RM. Current concerns in haematology. III. Blood count calibration. J ClinPathol 1991;144:881-4.
10. Lynch MJ, Raphael SS. Lynch’s Medical Laboratory Technology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 1976. p. 782-3.
11. Weir JA, Schlager G. Selection for total leucocyte count in the house mouse. Genetics 1962;47:433.
12. Weir JA, Schlager G. Selection for total leucocyte count in the house mouse and some physiological effects. Genetics 1962;47:1199.
13. Friedberg W, Neas BR, Faulkner DN, Friedberg MH. Immunity to Hymenolepis nana transfer by spleen cells. J Parasitol 1967;53:895-6.
14. Nidhi B, Ameeta K, Sharma RK, Katiyar AK. Histopathological changes in liver, kidney and muscles of pesticides exposed malnourished and diabetic rats. Indian J ExpBiol 2006;44:228-32.
15. Fetterer RH, Benett JL. Clonazepam and praziquantel: Mode of antischistosomal action. Federation Proc Abstract 2070 1978;37:604.
16. Murrell KD. Helminths. In: The Mouse in Biomedical Research. Experimental Biology and Oncology, Vol. 4, Academy Press; 1982. p. 225.
17. Furukawa T, Shinkai S, Shimamura M, Miyazato T. Peripheral blood eosinophilia in mice with Hymenolepis nana infection. Acta Medica Kinki Univ 1985;10:197-205.
18. Williams JF. Recent advances in the immunology of cestode infections. J Parasitol 1979;65:337-49.
19. Rickard MD, Williams JF. Hydatidosis/ Cysticercosis: Immune mechanisms and immunization against infection. AdvParsitol 1982;21:229-96.
20. Brooker S, Alexender N. Contrasting patterns in the small-scale heterogeneity of human helminth infections in urban and rural environments in Brazil. Intl J Parasitol 2006;36:1143.