- *Corresponding Author:
- Yuchen Xiang
Department of Medical Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
E-mail: 2021332864035@mails.zstu.edu.cn
This article was originally published in a special issue, “Drug Discovery and Repositioning Studies in Biopharmaceutical Sciences” |
Indian J Pharm Sci 2024:86(4) Spl Issue “334-341” |
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
Abstract
The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 technology stands out as the paramount gene-editing tool owing to its unparalleled efficiency and precision. It has rapidly been applied to various biological systems, including bacteria, plants and yeasts. P. pastoris (now known as Komagataella phaffii) is a commonly used industrial microorganism with advantages such as rapid growth, high-density culture, robust expression of exogenous proteins, with its simplicity in genomic manipulation, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 renders itself as an optimal platform for synthesizing recombinant proteins, enzymes and various biologics. The application of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 in P. pastoris focuses on gene editing and bio manufacturing, enabling precise modifications of its genome to enhance metabolic pathways and improve product quality. Recent advancements have demonstrated significant progress utilizing clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 for metabolic engineering and protein manipulation in P. pastoris, substantially increasing the yield of target metabolites and recombinant proteins. Despite these advances, technical challenges such as off-target effects and unstable editing efficiency remain. Therefore, further optimization of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeatsassociated protein 9 system, development of new Cas variants, and improvement in guide ribonucleic acid design are current research hotspots and challenges. This review systematically summarizes the progress of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 application in P. pastoris, focusing on specific application examples and technology optimization strategies in gene editing and bio manufacturing. It also discusses the current challenges and future research directions. The aim is to provide researchers with a comprehensive and in-depth knowledge framework to promote the further development and application of this technology in bio manufacturing, stimulate more innovative research ideas, and bring new breakthroughs in the genetic engineering and bio manufacturing of P. pastoris.
Keywords
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9, gene editing, P. pastoris, bio manufacturing
Gene editing has undergone rapid development in the past few decades, and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Associated Protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) has become one of the most influential gene editing tools due to its high efficiency, precision and relatively simple operation[1]. Since the CRISPR/Cas9 system was first adapted for use in mammalian cells in 2012, this system has rapidly expanded to a variety of biological systems[2,3]. The core components of CRISPR/Cas9 include the Cas9 nuclease and guide Ribonucleic Acid (gRNA), which work together to act on specific Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) sequences to induce double-stranded breaks, allowing for the targeted editing of genes[4]. Due to its efficiency and flexibility, CRISPR-Cas9 shows great potential in areas such as basic research, disease treatment and bio manufacturing[5].
P. pastoris (P. pastoris), now renamed Komagataella phaffii[6], is a commonly used methanolic nutritive yeast that is important in bio manufacturing[7]. Its advantages include rapid growth, high cell density culture, robust exogenous protein expression and easy genomic manipulation[8]. These properties of P. pastoris make it an ideal host for the production of recombinant proteins, enzymes and other biologics[9]. Employing CRISPR/Cas9 offers a superiorly efficient and accurate method for editing the genome of Pichia yeast, significantly increasing the speed and flexibility of genetic modification [10].
The application of the CRISPR/Cas9 in P. pastoris focuses on two aspects; gene editing and bio manufacturing. Through gene editing, precise modifications of the Picot yeast genome can be realized, including gene knockout, knock-in, mutation and regulation[11]. Emerging gene editing methods provide new means to study the physiological functions, optimize the metabolic pathways and improve the bio manufacturing capacity of P. pastoris. In bio manufacturing, P. pastoris is widely used as a good bioreactor for the production of a variety of recombinant proteins, including pharmaceutical proteins, industrial enzymes and vaccines[12]. The application of CRISPR/Cas9 has greatly enhanced the productivity and product quality of P. pastoris in these areas.
Over the past few years, numerous research endeavors have documented the effective utilization of CRISPR/ Cas9 within P. pastoris. Protein engineering of P. pastoris using CRISPR/Cas9 can optimize its protein expression system and improve the yield and quality of recombinant proteins[13]. However, despite the remarkable progress in the application of CRISPR/ Cas9 in P. pastoris, there are still some technical challenges, such as off-target effects and unstable editing efficiency[14]. Therefore, further optimization of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, development of new Cas variants and improvement of gRNA design are the hotspots and difficulties of current research.
This review aims to systematically summarize the progress of CRISPR/Cas9 application in P. pastoris, focusing on its specific application examples and technology optimization strategies in gene editing and bio manufacturing. First, we will introduce the principles and advantages of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, then discuss in detail its specific applications and optimization methods in P. pastoris genome editing. Then, we will overview examples of CRISPR/Cas9 applications in P. pastoris bio manufacturing, including recent advances in metabolic engineering and protein engineering. Finally, we’ll examine the present hurdles facing the implementation of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in P. pastoris and anticipate forthcoming research pathways and prospects for advancement. Through this review, we hope to provide researchers with a comprehensive and in-depth knowledge framework of the application of CRISPR/Cas9 in P. pastoris, and to promote the further development and application of this technology in the field of bio manufacturing. The review article not only summarizes the current research results, but also proposes future research directions, which are expected to stimulate more innovative research ideas and bring new breakthroughs in genetic engineering and biomanufacturing of P. pastoris.
MECHANISMS OF CRISPR/CAS9 WORK IN P. pastoris
CRISPR/Cas9 can be used for site-specific cleavage in P. pastoris by designing gRNAs based on the target DNA sequence. gRNAs are composed of two parts; CRISPR RNA (crRNA), which is responsible for recognizing and binding to the target DNA sequence, and a trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA), which binds to the crRNA and directs the Cas9 nuclease[15]. Genes encoding gRNA and Cas9 proteins are inserted into an expression vector. These vectors are usually free plasmids capable of replication and expression in P. pastoris cells[16]. Expression vectors were introduced into P. pastoris cells by electroporation[17]. After transformation, cells express gRNA and Cas9 proteins. In P. pastoris cells, the gRNA directs the Cas9 protein to target DNA sequences that are complementary to the gRNA. The target sequence usually has a short Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM) sequence upstream, which Cas9 recognizes and binds to[18]. As soon as the gRNA binds to the target DNA sequence, the Cas9 protein triggers a Double-Strand Break (DSB) at the specific site of the target sequence.
After DSB occurs, P. pastoris cells undergo DNA repair, and in the absence of a template, P. pastoris genes are inactivated due to random deletions or insertions of bases after being cut by CRISPR/ Cas9, which triggers the Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) repair mechanism in P. pastoris[19]. Although NHEJ repair is very hard to predict, highfidelity knockdown of short overlapping sequences (30 bq) is currently possible by amplification and Sanger sequencing to screen target sites for insertion of deletion mutations and to confirm the formation of early stop codons[20]. Liao et al.[21] found that the yeast pGAP or pCYC1 promoter-driven reporter gene eGFP exhibited strong repression (>70 %) with up to ~3.5-fold activation. Gene editing by using RNA Pol III promoter-driven single guide RNA (sgRNA) expression. Rapid recovery of selectable markers using eliminable free plasmids enabled knockdown efficiencies of up to 100 %. In general, P. pastoris has a high probability of developing NHEJ, which means that CRISPR/Cas9 can be targeted to knock out a specific gene on the P. pastoris genome, and the function of the gene can be determined after screening and culture. Therefore, CRISPR/Cas9 can also be applied to the functional genomics of P. pastoris in the future. In addition, new defective types of P. pastoris can also be realized by targeted gene knockout using CRISPR/Cas9[22].
If a donor DNA fragment containing the desired modification is provided, the cell can be precisely repaired using the Homologous Recombination (HR) mechanism, which enables knock-in or specific gene editing cells to recognize the donor DNA (donor DNA) containing the homologous arm[23]. Donor DNA is inserted at the target location or replaced with a specific sequence after the design is complete. The ends of the donor DNA contain sequences homologous to the ends of the DSB, and these homologous arms are usually between tens and hundreds of base pairs in length. The single-stranded end of the damaged DNA intrudes into the homologous sequence of the donor DNA, forming a D-loop. The donor DNA will serve as a template and new DNA strands are synthesized at the break position. Eventually it is Holliday junctions that are formed and untwisted. During the repair process, temporary crossover structures are formed and these are eventually unwound, restoring double-stranded DNA. This method has been widely used in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) and Yarrowia lipolytica, and the process is similar for the more closely related P. pastoris to both when performing HR[24].
P. pastoris is a commonly used industrial microorganism with a robust expression system and genetic stability to secrete proteins at high yields[25]. CRISPR/Cas9 can be used to optimize P. pastoris metabolic pathways and increase the yield of some products. For example, editing genes associated with metabolic pathways could increase the yield of biofuels, pharmaceutical intermediates or other high value-added compounds. For example, editing genes associated with metabolic pathways can increase the production of biofuels, pharmaceutical intermediates or other high value-added compounds.
CRISPR/Cas9 can be used to optimize P. pastoris metabolic pathways and increase the yield of some products. For example, editing genes associated with metabolic pathways can increase the yield of biofuels, pharmaceutical intermediates or other high value-added compounds. P. pastoris can tolerate high concentrations of 3-methyl-1-butanol, which makes it well suited for use in the production of isoamyl alcohol (3-methyl-1-butanol) as biodiesel. Down-regulation of by-product ethanol production using the CRISPR/Cas9 system resulted in a strain capable of producing 3M1B at a titer of 191.0±9.6 mg/l, which is the highest titer reported to date in an unconventional yeast[26].
In addition to CRISPR/Cas9, other members of the CRISPR family have shown significant promise in gene editing P. pastoris. Smirnov et al.[27] tested several codon optimizations of the MAD7 gene in conjunction with a variety of NLS and gRNA scaffolding sequences, demonstrating that CRISPR/ MAD7 can also be used for P. pastoris gene editing. However, gene knockdown of P. pastoris by CRISPR/ MAD7 is only 23 %-65 % as efficient as Cas9, and still requires continuous modification and improvement. CRISPR/dCas9 has also been shown to be used to target repression of promoters eGFP and AOXI, leading to the repression of fatty acyl coenzyme A synthetase genes (FAA1 and FAA2). Meanwhile, CRISPR/dCas9 showed strong inhibition of eGFP in the experiment and the highest efficiency could reach 85 %[28]. For their part, Baumschabl et al.[29] found that dCas9 can be fused to trans activator domains via RNA scaffolds to regulate gene expression when targeting gene promoter regions, which occurs when methanol or glucose are used as carbon sources.
Currently, other CRISPR family members, such as CRISPR/Cas12a (Cpf1), CRISPR/Cas13, CRISPR/ dCas9 (inactivated Cas9), CRISPR/Cas3 and CRISPR/Cas9 variants, are also showing promising results in microbial gene editing applications[30]. In the future, as CRISPR technology continues to improve and update, more new CRISPR systems will surely be applied to gene editing in P. pastoris.
REDIRECTING P. pastoris METABOLIC FLOW BY CRISPR/CAS9
Redirecting metabolic flux refers to altering the flow of metabolic pathways within a cell by means of genetic engineering in order to optimize the synthesis of specific metabolites or reduce the production of byproducts[31]. This approach is particularly important in metabolic engineering, where it can be a good way to increase the efficiency of microbial or other biological systems in producing specific compounds. CRISPR/Cas9 can be used to knock out competitive pathway genes for metabolic pathway optimization. This process is mainly realized through the NHEJ pathway[32]. If key genes in metabolic pathways that compete with target product synthesis for substrate or energy are deleted or inhibited, the by-product synthesis pathway in P. pastoris will be inhibited. Thus P. pastoris can use more substrate and energy for target product synthesis[33].
P. pastoris has excellent compatibility with exogenous genes. Unlike model organisms such as S. cerevisiae and Escherichia coli (E. coli), the mechanism of protein expression in P. pastoris is very similar to that of eukaryotes, especially mammalian cells[9]. P. pastoris has a powerful secretion mechanism that can efficiently secrete a wide range of recombinant proteins and a protein glycosylation pattern that is also closer to that of humans compared to that of S. cerevisiae. This makes it an ideal protein expression system, especially when high levels of secretion are required[34].
Therefore, P. pastoris has great potential for the production of biofuels, pharmaceutical intermediates and other high value-added compounds[35]. Importing crtE, crtB, and crtI into P. pastoris GS115 by CRISPR/ Cas12a establishes the heterologous lycopene pathway in P. pastoris and is also considered to be the most efficient pathway for lycopene expression in P. pastoris at present in the middle[30]. By designing modular, reliable gRNA-expressing host-specific cassettes, CRISPR/Cas9 can achieve 95 % editing efficiency in P. pastoris, resulting in the expression of human fibrinogen (K3), a humanized product [36].
The protein expression system of P. pastoris can be optimized by gene editing with CRISPR/Cas9, including knocking out genes that inhibit protein expression or inserting enhancer elements to increase the efficiency of exogenous protein expression. Liu et al.[37] used CRISPR/Cas9 as a template and designed CRISPRi and CRISPRiD for repression regulation and activation regulation, respectively, to produce α-amylase using P. pastoris SynPic-R as a bioreactor. Also they pointed out that SynPic-R was more efficient than GS115 in expressing α-amylase. As a technologically sophisticated vector, P. pastoris will be used to test exogenous genes from other species. Zhang et al.[38] successfully used CRISPR/Cas to edit the gene of P. pastoris to enable it to synthesize the CP protein of Clostridium mangostanus (CmCP).
It is foreseen that in P. pastoris, by knocking out key genes in the ethanol fermentation pathway (e.g. Alcohol Dehydrogenase I (ADH1), Pyruvate Decarboxylase 1 (PDC1)) and overexpressing key enzymes in the fatty acid synthesis pathway (eg. Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase 1 (ACC1)), more carbon sources can be used for fatty acid synthesis, thus increasing the yield of biodiesel[39]. Similar to S. cerevisiae, ADH1 in P. pastoris catalyzes the acetaldehyde reduction reaction to ethanol in the presence of cofactors, showing the potential to reduce the acetaldehyde content in wine[40]. Integration of multiple heterologous genes into P. pastoris cells to synthesize 2,3-Butanediol (BDO) in large quantities via CRISPR/Cas9 has been shown to be feasible[41]. Besides CRISPR/Cas offers the possibility of designing and introducing new metabolic pathways. Gao et al.[42] used a series of gRNA plasmids (for single-site, two-site and three-site integration) and a donor plasmid (containing homology arms for integration and promoters and terminators to drive the expression of heterologous genes) to recombine the P. pastoris GS115 to enable the synthesis of BDO, β-carotene, zeaxanthin and astaxanthin using methanol as a carbon source. P. pastoris can also be used as a bioreactor for the production of terpenoids, polyketides, flavonoids and especially α-sandalene (a bicyclic sesquiterpene). Combined with media optimization and bioprocess engineering, the best strain (STE-9) produced titers of up to 829.8±70.6 mg/l in shaker flasks, 4.4±0.3 g/l in batch fermenter and 4.4±0.3 g/l in refilled batch fermenter, respectively and 21.5±1.6 g/l of α-sandalene, respectively. These represent the highest α-sandalene yields ever reported, highlighting the advantages of P. pastoris in the production of terpenoids and other natural products[43].
PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES IN CRISPR/CAS9 APPLICATION FOR GENE EDITING IN P. pastoris CEREVISIAE
S. cerevisiae is an important carrier for traditional biosynthesis with low production cost, mature technology and simple operation. P. pastoris is able to grow at high density in the fermenter and the highest cell density can reach 130 g/l stem cell weight, which is very favorable for industrial production[44]. Moreover, P. pastoris is more receptive to exogenous genes, and the protein expression mechanism of P. pastoris is more similar to that of human body[45]. P. pastoris has a unique methanol-induced expression. The AOX1 promoter of P. pastoris is strongly induced in the presence of methanol, which enables efficient and controlled exogenous protein expression. In industrial practice, P. pastoris is also favored by researchers for its low fermentation by-products and high tolerance to stressful environments[42].
P. pastoris has a much lower HR efficiency compared to commonly used S. cerevisiae. This may be because the homology between the donor DNA and the target site is not high enough or the homology arm length is insufficient. It may also be because the intracellular environment of Pichia yeast may be unfavorable to HR, limiting the activity of homologous recombinase or the stability of donor DNA. Under the effect of multiple factors, Picros yeast prefers to use the NHEJ mechanism rather than the HR mechanism in repairing DNA and DSBs. However, NHEJ is a fast but less precise repair method and is mainly used for gene knockout rather than gene editing.
Thus, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 for gene editing in P. pastoris remains challenging. Deletions of P. pastoris target gene disruptions are usually inserted randomly into the genome through ectopic integration (correct targeting rate of <1 %-30 %), requiring laborious screening procedures to identify the correct knockout strains[46]. This has caused great difficulties for many research teams. The efficiency of P. pastoris HR can be effectively improved by developing a novel CRISPR/Cas9 system with High Editing Efficiency and Recoverable dystrophy-Selective Markers (HiEE-ReSM)[47]. A NHEJ defective strain (Δku70) was constructed based on the CRISPR/Cas9 gene defective method. It was then used as a parental strain for multilocus gene integration. Ten gRNA targets were designed within 100 bp upstream of the promoter or downstream of the terminator, and then tested and confirmed as suitable single-locus integration sites using eGFP reporter genes[48]. Nucleic acid exonuclease binding to Cas9 enhances homologous recombination in P. pastoris cells, and endogenous nucleic acid exonucleases MRE11 and EXO1 have the highest positivity in FAA1 seamless deletion, and MRE11 has the highest positivity for fusion to the C-terminus of CAS9, with a relatively high number of clones[49].
Some researchers have also broken the inefficient HR mechanism of P. pastoris itself by introducing the HR mechanism of S. cerevisiae and using a short (40 bp) homology arm in P. pastoris to achieve multiple genome integration[50]. Not only that, but improving HR efficiency in P. pastoris by means of disrupting the NHEJ machinery has been the subject of heated discussion. Dalvie et al.[36] have attacked this problem through an alternative approach. Their sequencingbased strategy was used to design host-specific cassettes for modular, reliable and guided RNA expression. Using this strategy, they successfully achieved up to 95 % gene editing efficiency in P. pastoris.
Gene editing of P. pastoris with CRISPR/Cas9 also suffers from off-target problems. This problem can be effectively avoided by using a high-fidelity Cas9 enzyme (eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1), which enables more precise editing. Designing primers and RNAs with high specificity is also considered a feasible approach. Along with the development of bioinformatics technology, using bioinformatics tools to predict potential off-target sites to avoid selecting primers and RNA fragments similar to offtarget sites is also worth considering. Currently, the off-target problem of CRISPR/Cas9 has been better solved in human cells, bacteria and so on[51,52].
Glycosylation can generally be divided into O-mannosylation and N-glycosylation, both of which are highly conserved in biological evolution. The O-glycosylation of P. pastoris is much simpler compared to mammals, with a maximum of only six mannose residues[53]. N-glycosylation of P. pastoris generates mainly sugar chains containing many mannose sugars, containing a sugar molecule not found in mammalian cells, the α-1,3-mannose modification. Humanization of the process of glycosylation of P. pastoris by gene editing has now been shown to be feasible, and Bretthauer et al.[54] have begun to produce protein-based drugs by this method many years ago. It is clear that the efficiency of modifying glycosylated genes by the CRISPR/ Cas9 system has been considerably higher than several past methods, including ZFN and TALEN[13].
Methanol, as a toxic and flammable hazardous compound, is dangerous during storage and use. The process of using methanol to induce the P. pastoris AOXI promoter can be very polluting and environmentally unfriendly. Attempting to get P. pastoris to stop using methanol as a carbon source by means of gene editing seems to be difficult, and there are very few teams researching this area. Only Gassler et al.[55] attempted to establish a carbon source fixation pathway similar to the Calvin- Benson-Bassham cycle by modifying the P. pastoris genome to free it from methanol dependence and make it an autotrophic strain. However, the carbon source of this method is carbon monoxide, which is still dangerous. The future application of CRISPR/ Cas9 technology in P. pastoris genome modification should change this situation significantly.
Although CRISPR-based genome editing tools are available for P. pastoris there is still a severe shortage of tools and genetic elements currently available for metabolic engineering of P. pastoris compared to commonly used model organisms including S. cerevisiae, E. coli and other microorganisms[56]. Future research will require the development of additional tools such as promoter libraries, UTR sequences, terminator sequences, genomic loci for gene integration, dynamic regulatory tools and other genetic material[57]. With the development of RNA-seq, single-cell analysis, and high-throughput analysis, it has become convenient to develop tools for genetic modification of P. pastoris[35].
Conclusion
This paper reviews the multiple applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in P. pastoris, including gene knockout, gene knock-in, metabolic engineering and protein expression optimization. CRISPR technology has demonstrated great advantages in the field of genome editing due to its high efficiency, precision and versatility. P. pastoris, as an important biotechnology platform, has been widely used in biopharmaceuticals, industrial enzyme production and food additives due to its rapid growth, simple culture conditions and high protein expression capacity. Through the application of CRISPR technology, significant progress has been made in the research and application of P. pastoris, including metabolic pathway optimization and redirection of metabolic flow.
In the future, the combination of CRISPR technology with synthetic biology, metabolomics and other emerging biotechnologies will further expand the research and application fields of P. pastoris. Improvement of CRISPR systems to enhance editing efficiency, reduce off-target effects and develop novel CRISPR systems will be important research directions in the future. In addition, the application of CRISPR technology in optimizing the production process of P. pastoris and developing new biological products is promising. The higher NHEJ efficiency and lower HR efficiency of P. pastoris make CRISPR/ Cas9 suitable for performing functional genomics research and phenotypic screening.
However, current technologies still face challenges in gene editing efficiency, off-target effects, and biosafety, so CRISPR/Cas has been used far less in Microsporum than in S. cerevisiae and E. coli. Future research needs to focus on solving these problems and advancing the widespread application of CRISPR technology in P. pastoris through interdisciplinary and international collaborations to realize its great potential in bio manufacturing and basic research.
Conflict of interests:
The authors declared no conflict of interests.
References
- Zhang F, Wen Y, Guo X. CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: Progress, implications and challenges. Hum Mol Genet 2014;23(R1):R40-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Manghwar H, Lindsey K, Zhang X, Jin S. CRISPR/Cas system: Recent advances and future prospects for genome editing. Trends Plant Sci 2019;24(12):1102-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- di Carlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucl Acids Res 2013;41(7):4336-43.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 2014;157(6):1262-78.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lino CA, Harper JC, Carney JP, Timlin JA. Delivering CRISPR: A review of the challenges and approaches. Drug Deliv 2018;25(1):1234-57.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kurtzman CP. Biotechnological strains of Komagataella (Pichia) pastoris are Komagataella phaffii as determined from multigene sequence analysis. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2009;36(11):1435.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zavec D, Gasser B, Mattanovich D. Characterization of methanol utilization negative Pichia pastoris for secreted protein production: New cultivation strategies for current and future applications. Biotechnol Bioeng 2020;117(5):1394-405.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Schwarzhans JP, Luttermann T, Geier M, Kalinowski J, Friehs K. Towards systems metabolic engineering in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Adv 2017;35(6):681-710.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Karbalaei M, Rezaee SA, Farsiani H. Pichia pastoris: A highly successful expression system for optimal synthesis of heterologous proteins. J Cell Physiol 2020;235(9):5867-81.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lobs AK, Schwartz C, Wheeldon I. Genome and metabolic engineering in non-conventional yeasts: Current advances and applications. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2017;2(3):198-207.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Weninger A, Hatzl AM, Schmid C, Vogl T, Glieder A. Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. J Biotechnol 2016;235:139-49.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Barone GD, Emmerstorfer-Augustin A, Biundo A, Pisano I, Coccetti P, Mapelli V, et al. Industrial production of proteins with Pichia pastoris-Komagataella phaffii. Biomolecule 2023;13(3):441.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gao J, Jiang L, Lian J. Development of synthetic biology tools to engineer Pichia pastoris as a chassis for the production of natural products. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2021;6(2):110-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pineda M, Lear A, Collins JP, Kiani S. Safe CRISPR: Challenges and possible solutions. Trends Biotechnol 2019;37(4):389-401.
- Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013;339(6121):819-23.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gu Y, Gao J, Cao M, Dong C, Lian J, Huang L, et al. Construction of a series of episomal plasmids and their application in the development of an efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system in Pichia pastoris. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;35:1.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Wu S, Letchworth GJ. High efficiency transformation by electroporation of Pichia pastoris pretreated with lithium acetate and dithiothreitol. Biotechniques 2004;36(1):152-4.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Yang Y, Liu G, Chen X, Liu M, Zhan C, Liu X, et al. High efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system with an eliminable episomal sgRNA plasmid in Pichia pastoris. Enzyme Microb Technol 2020;138:109556.
- Bernauer L, Radkohl A, Lehmayer LG, Emmerstorfer-Augustin A. Komagataella phaffii as emerging model organism in fundamental research. Front Microbiol 2021;11:607028.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dalvie NC, Lorgeree T, Biedermann AM, Love KR, Love JC. Simplified gene knockout by CRISPR-Cas9 induced homologous recombination. ACS Synth Biol 2021;11(1):497-501.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liao X, Li L, Jameel A, Xing XH, Zhang C. A versatile toolbox for CRISPR-based genome engineering in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2021;105:9211-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Naseri G, Prause K, Hamdo HH, Arenz C. Artificial transcription factors for tuneable gene expression in Pichia pastoris. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021;9:676900.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Shao Y, Xue C, Liu W, Zuo S, Wei P, Huang L, et al. High-level secretory production of leghemoglobin in Pichia pastoris through enhanced globin expression and heme biosynthesis. Bioresour Technol 2022;363:127884.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gao S, Tong Y, Wen Z, Zhu L, Ge M, Chen D, et al. Multiplex gene editing of the Yarrowia lipolytica genome using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;43(8):1085-93.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Parashar D, Satyanarayana T. Enhancing the production of recombinant acidic α-amylase and phytase in Pichia pastoris under dual promoters (constitutive (GAP) and inducible (AOX)) in mixed fed batch high cell density cultivation. Process Biochem 2016;51(10):1315-22.
- Siripong W, Angela C, Tanapongpipat S, Runguphan W. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for production of isopentanol (3-Methyl-1-butanol). Enzyme Micro Technol 2020;138:109557.
- Smirnov K, Weiss F, Hatzl AM, Rieder L, Olesen K, Jensen S, et al. Comparison of CRISPR-MAD7 and CRISPR-Cas9 for gene disruptions in Komagataella phaffii. J Fungi 2024;10(3):197.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Qiao S, Bai F, Cai P, Zhou YJ, Yao L. An improved CRISPRi system in Pichia pastoris. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2023;8(3):479-85.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Baumschabl M, Prielhofer R, Mattanovich D, Steiger MG. Fine-tuning of transcription in Pichia pastoris using dCas9 and RNA scaffolds. ACS Synth Biol 2020;9(12):3202-9.
- Zhang X, Chen S, Lin Y, Li W, Wang D, Ruan S, et al. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for high-level production of lycopene. ACS Synth Biol 2023;12(10):2961-72.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tian T, Kang JW, Kang A, Lee TS. Redirecting metabolic flux via combinatorial multiplex CRISPRi-mediated repression for isopentenol production in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth Biol 2019;8(2):391-402.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Yang P, Jiang S, Lu S, Jiang S, Jiang S, Deng Y, et al. Ethanol yield improvement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae GPD2 Delta FPS1 Delta ADH2 Delta DLD3 Delta mutant and molecular mechanism exploration based on the metabolic flux and transcriptomics approaches. Microb Cell Fact 2022;21(1):160.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Yang Z, Zhang Z. Engineering strategies for enhanced production of protein and bio-products in Pichia pastoris: A review. Biotechnol Adv 2018;36(1):182-95.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Spohner SC, Müller H, Quitmann H, Czermak P. Expression of enzymes for the usage in food and feed industry with Pichia pastoris. J Biotechnol 2015;202:118-34.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kang Z, Huang H, Zhang Y, Du G, Chen J. Recent advances of molecular toolbox construction expand Pichia pastoris in synthetic biology applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;33:1-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dalvie NC, Leal J, Whittaker CA, Yang Y, Brady JR, Love KR, et al. Host-informed expression of CRISPR guide RNA for genomic engineering in Komagataella phaffii. ACS Synth Biol 2019;9(1):26-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liu Q, Song L, Peng Q, Zhu Q, Shi X, Xu M, et al. A programmable high-expression yeast platform responsive to user-defined signals. Sci Adv 2022;8(6),eabl5166.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhang Z, Li Y, Luo L, Hao J, Li J. Characterization of cmcp gene as a pathogenicity factor of Ceratocystis manginecans. Front Microbiol 2020;11:529367.
- Karaoglan M, Karaoglan FE, Inan M. Functional analysis of Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH) genes in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Lett 2016;38:463-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Geng K, Lin Y, Zheng X, Li C, Chen S, Ling H, et al. Enhanced expression of alcohol dehydrogenase I in Pichia pastoris reduces the content of acetaldehyde in wines. Microorganisms 2023;12(1):38.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gao J, Cheng J, Lian J. Multiplex marker-less genome integration in Pichia pastoris using CRISPR/Cas9. Methods Mol Biol 2024;2760:157-67.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gao J, Xu J, Zuo Y, Ye C, Jiang L, Feng L, et al. Synthetic biology toolkit for marker-less integration of multigene pathways into Pichia pastoris via CRISPR/Cas9. ACS Synth Biol 2022;11(2):623-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zuo Y, Xiao F, Gao J, Ye C, Jiang L, Dong C, et al. Establishing Komagataella phaffii as a cell factory for efficient production of sesquiterpenoid α-Santalene. J Agric Food Chem 2022;70(26):8024-31.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Shen D, He X, Weng P, Liu Y, Wu Z. A review of yeast: High cell-density culture, molecular mechanisms of stress response and tolerance during fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 2022;22(1):foac050.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liu C, Gong JS, Su C, Li H, Li H, Rao ZM, et al. Pathway engineering facilitates efficient protein expression in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2022;106(18):5893-912.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Weninger A, Fischer JE, Raschmanova H, Kniely C, Vogl T, Glieder A. Expanding the CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for Pichia pastoris with efficient donor integration and alternative resistance markers. J Cell Biochem 2018;119(4):3183-98.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Wang X, Li Y, Jin Z, Liu X, Gao X, Guo S, et al. A novel CRISPR/Cas9 system with high genomic editing efficiency and recyclable auxotrophic selective marker for multiple-step metabolic rewriting in Pichia pastoris. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2023;8(3):445-51.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Liu Q, Shi X, Song L, Liu H, Zhou X, Wang Q, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genomic multiloci integration in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 2019;18(1):144.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhang K, Duan X, Cai P, Gao L, Wu X, Yao L, et al. Fusing an exonuclease with Cas9 enhances homologous recombination in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 2022;21(1):182.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gao J, Ye C, Cheng J, Jiang L, Yuan X, Lian J. Enhancing homologous recombination efficiency in Pichia pastoris for multiplex genome integration using short homology arms. ACS Synth Biol 2022;11(2):547-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim JS. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31(3):230-2.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kim D, Bae S, Park J, Kim E, Kim S, Yu HR, et al. Digenome-seq: Genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat Method 2015;12(3):237-43.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Neubert P, Strahl S. Protein O-mannosylation in the early secretory pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2016;41:100-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bretthauer RK. Genetic engineering of Pichia pastoris to humanize N-glycosylation of proteins. Trends Biotechnol 2003;21(11):459-62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gassler T, Sauer M, Gasser B, Egermeier M, Troyer C, Causon T, et al. The industrial yeast Pichia pastoris is converted from a heterotroph into an autotroph capable of growth on CO2. Nat Biotechnol 2020;38(2):210-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cai P, Duan X, Wu X, Gao L, Ye M, Zhou YJ. Recombination machinery engineering facilitates metabolic engineering of the industrial yeast Pichia pastoris. Nucl Acids Res 2021;49(13):7791-805.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zha J, Liu D, Ren J, Liu Z, Wu X. Advances in metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris strains as powerful cell factories. J Fungi 2023;9(10):1027.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]