Abstract

In this study, 200 patients with colorectal cancer surgery from January 2013 to June 2018 were recruited and divided into the rapid rehabilitation treatment group and the control group. Basic information was collected and albumin expression level is analysed. In addition, the pain grading method was used to grade the postoperative conditions to observe the treatment effect of the rapid rehabilitation treatment group and control group. The results showed that there is no statistical difference between the two groups in the basic situation and previous history of the two groups. In the analysis of albumin expression level, significant statistical differences were found between the two groups and at different time points. And in the analysis of postoperative pain levels of patients in the two groups, it was found that the proportion of taking painkillers in the rapid rehabilitation treatment group is significantly lower, and with the increase of postoperative time, the final pain levels of patients in the two groups show a statistical difference (p<0.05). Therefore, it is found that rapid rehabilitation is indeed better than the traditional perioperative treatment in this study. Although there are some deficiencies in the experimental process, it still provides a new experimental reference basis for the treatment of colorectal cancer in the future.