- *Corresponding Author:
- Nittya k. Dogra
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, Punjabi University, Patiala-147 002, India
E-mail: 24nittyakdogra@gmail.com
| Date of Submission | 08 March 2015 |
| Date of Revision | 16 January 2016 |
| Date of Acceptance | 10 February 2016 |
| Indian J Pharm Sci, 2016;78(1):169‑171 |
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Abstract
Plumeria(Apocynaceae) is a genus comprising mostly of lactiferous trees and deciduous shrubs. Plumeria obtusaL. is a widely available but pharmacologically lesser explored species of this genus. Thus, present research was undertaken to determine the phytochemical constituents and the antioxidant potential of the methanol extract and fractions of the plant. The antioxidant potential was determined using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging and inhibition of lipid peroxidation assay.
Keywords
Antioxidant studies, apocynaceae, DPPH assay, lipid peroxidation, Plumeria obtusa
Plumeria obtusa L. (Apocynaceae) commonly known as Gulechin, Graveyard Tree or Frangipanier [1,2] is a small, much-branched, evergreen or partly deciduous tree [3]. The plant has been used in the management of diabetes mellitus, asthma, gonorrhea and constipation and also as a contraceptive, expectorant and anthelmintic [4-6]. The present study was undertaken3 to determine the antioxidant activity of methanol leaf extract and various fractions of P. obtusa.
The leaves were collected from Lucknow and identified at Central Drug Research Institute (CDRI), Lucknow. They were shade dried and powdered. Six hundred grams of plant material was soaked in methanol (6 l×3 times) at room temperature for 48 h to get methanol extract. The methanol extract was concentrated using rotary evaporator to get a residue of about 100 g. Ten grams of crude methanol extract was used for evaluating biological activities and the rest for preparing fractions using solvents such as hexane, ethyl acetate, n-butanol and distilled water. All the fractions were concentrated individually using rotary evaporator. Preliminary phytochemical analysis of extract and fractions was done using standard procedures [7] and results are given in Table 1.
| Chemical test | Methanol extract | Hexane fraction | Ethyl acetate fraction | n‑butanol fraction | Aqueous fraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates | − | − | − | − | − |
| Sterols | + | + | − | − | − |
| Alkaloids | + | − | + | + | − |
| Flavonoids | + | − | + | + | + |
| Terpenoids | + | − | + | + | + |
| Glycosides | + | − | − | + | + |
| Saponins | − | − | − | − | − |
+: Presence of constituents, −: absence
Table 1: Phytochemical Analysis Of Methanol Extract And Various Fractions Of Plumeria Obtusa
The radical scavenging activity of crude methanol extract of P. obtusa and its fractions was studied by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay [8]. Briefly, to a methanol solution of DPPH (100 μM, 2.95 ml), 0.05 ml of test compounds dissolved in methanol was added at different concentration (200-1000 μg/ml). Reaction mixture was shaken and absorbance was measured at 517 nm using UV/Vis spectrophotometer at regular intervals of 30 s for 5 min, and the reading was taken till 20 min. Radical scavenging activity was expressed as % inhibition of DPPH radicals. Ascorbic acid was used as standard.
A modified thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) assay [9] was used to measure the lipid peroxide formed, using egg yolk homogenate as lipid rich media [10]. Egg homogenate (0.5 ml, 10% in distilled water v/v) and different concentration of P. obtusa leaf extract and fractions (200-1000 μg/ml) were allowed to react with 0.05 ml FeSO4 (0.07 M) and then incubated for 30 min to induce lipid peroxidation. Subsequently 1.5 ml of 20% acetic acid (pH adjusted to 3.5 with NaOH) and 1.5 ml of 0.8% TBA (w/v) was (prepared in 1.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.5ml of 20% TCA) added, vortexed and then heated in a boiling water bath for 60 min. After cooling 5.0 ml of 1-butanol was added to each tube and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The absorbance of the organic upper layer was measured at 532 nm. The antioxidant activity was expressed as percentage inhibition of lipid peroxidation. Tocopherol was used as a reference standard. The leaf extract and fractions of P. obtusa have shown moderate antioxidant activity (Tables 2 and 3) based on DPPH and lipid peroxidation inhibition assays in dose dependent-manner.
| Concentration (µg/ml) | Percentage of DPPH radical inhibition±SEMa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol extract | Hexane fraction | Ethyl acetate fraction | n‑butanol fraction | Aqueous fraction | |
| 200 | 18.55±0.37 | 16.12±0.12 | 34.32±0.15 | 37.33±0.24 | 11.56±0.25 |
| 400 | 29.34±0.56 | 26.42±0.24 | 42.65±0.62 | 47.23±0.42 | 17.52±0.34 |
| 600 | 38.12±0.641 | 39.18±0.52 | 51.34±0.62 | 59.22±0.83 | 27.52±0.67 |
| 800 | 45.24±0.52 | 43.24±0.21 | 62.81±1.36 | 67.17±0.51 | 32.86±0.52 |
| 1000 | 59.36±0.42 | 46.35±0.32 | 68.02±1.25 | 84.42±1.15 | 42.25±0.44 |
| Ascorbic acid (100 µM) | 91.62±0.54 | ||||
aResults are expressed as mean±SEM of 3 replicates. SEM: Standard error of mean, DPPH: 1,1‑diphenyl‑2‑picrylhydrazyl
Table 2: In Vitro1,1 Diphenyl 2 Picrylhydrazyl Radical Scavenging Activity Of Extract Andfractions
| Sample (µg/ml) | Percentage of lipid peroxide inhibition±SEMa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol extract | Hexane fraction | Ethyl acetate fraction | n‑butanol fraction | Aqueous fraction | |
| 200 | 18.43±0.14 | 12.56±0.23 | 31.72±0.45 | 32.10±0.15 | 26.44±0.32 |
| 400 | 25.62±0.33 | 19.24±0.26 | 34.16±0.25 | 3619±0.52 | 32.63±0.46 |
| 600 | 34.33±0.55 | 27.42±0.54 | 46.33±0.46 | 55.42±0.84 | 41.54±0.32 |
| 800 | 35.42±0.34 | 31.25±0.28 | 55.26±0.54 | 65.26±1.22 | 50.22±0.24 |
| 1000 | 46.32±0.62 | 37.29±0.37 | 72.82±0.27 | 78.15±0.82 | 58.32±0.75 |
| Tocopherol (100 µM) | 92.26±0.45 | ||||
aResults are expressed as mean±SEM of 3 replicates. SEM: Standard error of mean
Table 3: In Vitro effect Of Extract And Fractions On Lipid Peroxidation
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- Krishnamurthi AS. The Wealth of India. New Delhi (India): Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1969.
- Gandhi M, Singh Y. Brahma’s Hair: The Mythology of Indian Plants. India: Rupa and Co.; 2000.
- Cowen DV. Flowering Trees and Shrubs of India. 4th ed. India: Thacker and Co.; 1952.
- Semenya S, Potgieter M, Erasmus L. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by Bapedi healers to treat diabetes mellitus in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol 2012;141:440-5.
- Haque MM, Choudhury MS, Hossain MS, Haque MA, Seraj S, Rahmatullah M. Ethnographic information and medicinal formulations of a Mro community of Gazalia Union in the Bandarbans district of Bangladesh. Am Eurasian J Sustain Agric 2012;6:162-71.
- Wetwitayaklung P, Phaechamud T, Limmatvapirat C, Keokitichai S. The study of antioxidant activities of edible flower extracts. ActaHortic 2008;786:185-92.
- Farnsworth NR. Biological and phytochemical screening of plants. Indian J Pharm Sci 1966;55:225-86.
- Blois M. Antioxidant determinations by the use of stable free radical. Nature 1958;26:1199.
- Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 1979;95:351-8.
- Ruberto G, Baratta MT, Deans SG, Dorman HJ. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Foeniculumvulgare and Crithmummaritimum essential oils. Planta Med 2000;66:687-93.
